The tougher new Zelda has PvP, kinda

We hear that The Legend of Zelda: A Link Between Worlds, out tomorrow, is pretty difficult. So difficult in fact that Nintendo included player-versus-player. What the crap?  Could a punishing, confrontational direction be the way the series is moving? Not just yet. For now, the game allows you to se

Share
The tougher new Zelda has PvP, kinda

We hear that The Legend of Zelda: A Link Between Worlds, out tomorrow, is pretty difficult. So difficult in fact that Nintendo included player-versus-player. What the crap?

Could a punishing, confrontational direction be the way the series is moving? Not just yet. For now, the game allows you to send a shadowy bounty hunter into another player’s game to vie for rupees by way of StreetPass. The perpetrating player doesn’t directly control his fate, but builds a computer-controlled automaton that does the dirty work for him. True, there are diminished stakes. You are free to decline a challenge from an invader, which from my understanding is not how invasion works.

There are even shades of Dark Souls in here, which goes along with critic Tevin Thompson’s internet-famous call out. “[Skyward Sword is] the culmination of years of reducing the world to a series of bottlenecks. . . But a world is not one predetermined sequence after another, and a world is not a puzzle with a single solution,” he wrote, longing for the mystery of the Souls games. A Link Between Worlds takes a stab at answering his request, giving the player the freedom to discover the world in any order they see fit.  If this course continues, it may only be a matter of time before we see corpse-raiding, rupee-plundering bandits raiding Hyrule. The question becomes: do we want this?